How the FTA Reviews Free Zone Corporate Tax Status

A free zone licence does not protect the 0% rate without continuous compliance

The first full cycle of UAE corporate tax returns has been filed and reviewed by the Federal Tax Authority. Free zone companies that assumed their licence guaranteed a 0% rate are receiving queries. The distinction between a Free Zone Person and a Qualifying Free Zone Person is the most consequential classification in the UAE corporate tax system, and the FTA is testing it.

Article 18 of the Corporate Tax Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022) sets out five cumulative conditions for QFZP status. Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025 defines qualifying and excluded activities, replacing the earlier MD 265 of 2023 retroactively from 1 June 2023. Ministerial Decision No. 84 of 2025 requires audited financial statements for all QFZPs, regardless of revenue. Cabinet Decision No. 100 of 2023 governs the determination of qualifying income. Together, these instruments create a compliance framework where a single failure in any period triggers a five-year lockout from the 0% regime. Corporate lawyers in the UAE advise free zone companies on QFZP structuring, compliance review, and FTA audit response.

• QFZP status requires five cumulative conditions to be met in every tax period: the company must be a juridical person registered in a UAE free zone, maintain adequate substance, derive qualifying income from qualifying activities, stay within the de minimis threshold for non-qualifying revenue, comply with transfer pricing rules for related-party transactions, and prepare audited financial statements. Failure on any condition causes loss of status from the beginning of that tax period.
• The five-year lockout is the defining penalty. A company that loses QFZP status is taxed at 9% on all income for the period of failure and the subsequent four tax periods. The lockout applies even if the company corrects the issue the following year. Voluntary exit from the QFZP regime also triggers the same five-year lockout. For a free zone company earning AED 10 million per year, the additional tax exposure across five years is up to AED 4.5 million.
• Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025 replaced MD 265 of 2023 and expanded the qualifying activities list to include industrial chemicals, environmental commodities (carbon credits, renewable energy certificates), and treasury and financing services for own account. It also tightened the guardrail for distribution and logistics activities: a QFZP whose revenue from distribution, warehousing, logistics, or inventory management constitutes 51% or more of total revenue cannot treat commodity trading as a qualifying activity.
• Audited financial statements are mandatory for all QFZPs from tax periods commencing 1 January 2025, under Ministerial Decision No. 84 of 2025. There is no revenue floor and no small business carve-out. The audit must be conducted by a UAE-licensed audit firm under IFRS. The audited accounts must demonstrate the segregation between qualifying and non-qualifying income.
• The de minimis threshold is the lower of 5% of total revenue or AED 5 million per tax period. Non-qualifying revenue exceeding this threshold disqualifies the company from QFZP status for five years. Revenue attributable to domestic permanent establishments and foreign permanent establishments is excluded from both the numerator and denominator of the calculation, preventing PE income (already taxed at 9%) from distorting the test.
• The FTA's Corporate Tax Guide for Free Zone Persons (CTGFZP1) provides the FTA's interpretive guidance on qualifying income categories, substance requirements, and the interaction between the QFZP regime and other corporate tax provisions. Companies relying on advisor analysis produced before September 2025 should reassess their position against the current MD 229 framework.

Who this applies to

Free zone companies claiming or planning to claim QFZP status. This includes DMCC, JAFZA, DAFZA, RAKEZ, Masdar City, Dubai Internet City, Dubai Media City, and all other UAE free zone entities that file corporate tax returns on the basis that some or all of their income qualifies for the 0% rate.

Accounting and audit firms preparing QFZP compliance packages. The audit obligation under MD 84 of 2025 means every QFZP now requires a UAE-licensed auditor to verify income classification, substance, and de minimis compliance. Auditors need to understand what the FTA examines to ensure the audit supports the client's tax position.

Parent companies with UAE free zone subsidiaries. International groups that structured their UAE operations in free zones for tax efficiency should review whether the subsidiaries meet all five conditions, because loss of QFZP status at the subsidiary level creates a tax cost that flows through to the group.

The five conditions the FTA tests

Condition 1: Juridical person in a UAE free zone

The company must be a juridical person incorporated, established, or registered in a UAE free zone. Natural persons and unincorporated partnerships cannot be QFZPs. A branch of a non-resident company registered in a free zone qualifies. A mainland company with "free zone" in its name does not qualify unless it holds a current free zone licence from the relevant free zone authority.

This is the first gatekeeper test. It fails more often than expected. The FTA cross-references trade licence data from free zone authorities with corporate tax registration records. Companies that have allowed licences to lapse, or that operate from mainland premises despite holding a free zone licence, face questions at the registration stage.

Condition 2: Adequate substance

The company must maintain adequate substance in the free zone. This means adequate employees (or equivalent outsourced personnel), adequate premises, and adequate operating expenditure relative to the nature of the activities conducted.

The substance test under the Corporate Tax Law draws on the same operational criteria as the former Economic Substance Regulations (ESR), which were abolished for financial years from 1 January 2023 under Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024. The ESR regime was replaced because the substance requirement was built into the QFZP conditions. The standard did not disappear. The stakes increased: ESR failures produced administrative fines up to AED 400,000. QFZP substance failures produce five years of 9% tax.

The FTA examines whether the company's core income-generating activities (CIGAs) are performed in the free zone. CIGAs are the activities that produce the income the company claims as qualifying. A holding company whose qualifying activity is holding shares must demonstrate that investment decisions, board meetings, and portfolio management occur in the free zone. A trading company must show that procurement, negotiation, and order execution happen in or from the free zone.

The substance test is qualitative. The FTA does not publish minimum headcount or expenditure thresholds. Instead, it assesses proportionality: does the substance match the scale and nature of the income? A free zone entity earning AED 50 million from commodity trading with one employee and a flexi-desk will attract scrutiny. A company with fifteen staff, a leased office, and documented trading operations will not.

Condition 3: Qualifying income from qualifying activities

The company must derive its income from qualifying activities as defined in Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025. The qualifying activities list includes:

Manufacturing or processing of goods and materials. Trading of qualifying commodities (metals, minerals, energy, agricultural products, industrial chemicals, environmental commodities, and associated by-products) where a quoted price exists on a recognised exchange or from a recognised price reporting agency. Holding of shares and other securities for investment purposes. Treasury and financing services to related parties or for own account. Headquarters services. Fund management, wealth management, and regulated asset management. Reinsurance. Ship management and chartering. Aircraft finance and leasing. Distribution, logistics, and warehousing in or from a designated zone (subject to the 51% guardrail). Certain professional services (accounting, audit, advisory, actuarial, brokerage, central procurement).

Income from excluded activities cannot benefit from the 0% rate, regardless of where it is earned. Excluded activities include transactions with natural persons (except for specific carve-outs in shipping, aircraft, and investment management), regulated banking, conventional insurance, and ownership or exploitation of immovable property outside free zone-to-free zone commercial dealings.

The most common classification error involves income from mainland customers. A free zone IT company earning revenue from a mainland government entity may assume the income qualifies because the activity (software development) is on the qualifying activities list. But the FTA examines the beneficial recipient test: is the mainland entity the end user of the service? If so, and if the activity is not specifically listed as qualifying when performed for non-free zone persons, the income is non-qualifying.

Condition 4: De minimis threshold

Non-qualifying revenue must not exceed the lower of 5% of total revenue or AED 5 million per tax period. Exceeding this threshold by any amount disqualifies the company from QFZP status for five years.

The calculation requires the company to segregate its revenue into qualifying, non-qualifying, and excluded categories in its chart of accounts. Revenue from domestic and foreign permanent establishments is carved out of both the numerator and the denominator, because that income is already taxed at 9% separately.

The de minimis test catches companies that earn small amounts of non-qualifying income they did not track. A free zone consulting firm that accepts one mainland implementation project worth AED 5,000,001 loses QFZP status for five years if total revenue is AED 100 million (because 5% of AED 100 million is AED 5 million, and AED 5,000,001 exceeds the AED 5 million cap).

The practical response is real-time revenue monitoring. Companies should track non-qualifying income monthly, not annually. By the time the auditor identifies a de minimis breach during the year-end audit, the damage is done.

Condition 5: Transfer pricing compliance and audited accounts

The company must comply with the arm's length principle for all related-party transactions. It must also prepare audited financial statements in accordance with MD 84 of 2025.

Transfer pricing compliance means maintaining documentation that supports the pricing of intercompany transactions. For companies that meet the thresholds for Master File and Local File obligations, the documentation must be prepared and available for FTA review. For companies below those thresholds, the arm's length principle still applies, and the FTA can request evidence that pricing reflects market conditions.

The audited financial statements must be prepared by a UAE-licensed audit firm under IFRS. The statements must include sufficient disclosure to demonstrate the split between qualifying and non-qualifying income. The FTA uses the audited accounts as the primary verification tool for the de minimis test and the income classification.

A common sequencing error: companies file their corporate tax return before the audit is completed, then discover during the audit that income was misclassified. Amending a filed return is possible but invites FTA scrutiny. The correct sequence is to finalise the audit, review the income classification, and then file the return.

What the FTA examines in practice

Income classification and revenue segregation

The FTA's primary focus is whether the company has correctly classified its income as qualifying or non-qualifying. This requires a chart of accounts that separates revenue into three buckets: qualifying income (0%), non-qualifying income (9%), and excluded income (carved out of the de minimis calculation).

The FTA cross-references the company's declared revenue classification against its trade licence activities, its customer base (are customers free zone persons or non-free zone persons?), and the nature of the services or goods provided. Discrepancies between the trade licence description and the actual commercial activities trigger deeper review.

For companies with mixed revenue streams, the FTA will request contracts, invoices, and customer verification to confirm whether each revenue line qualifies. A commodity trading company that also provides logistics services must demonstrate that the logistics revenue does not exceed the 51% guardrail, or the trading income loses its qualifying status.

Substance documentation

The FTA reviews substance through payroll records (WPS data), office lease agreements, utility bills, visa records, board minutes, and evidence that management decisions are made in the free zone. The review focuses on whether CIGAs are performed in the free zone by persons with the qualifications and authority to perform them.

Companies that outsource CIGAs to related or unrelated parties outside the free zone face higher scrutiny. Outsourcing is permitted, but the company must demonstrate that it directs and controls the outsourced activities from within the free zone, and that the outsourcing arrangement is priced at arm's length.

Transfer pricing

Related-party transactions are reviewed for arm's length pricing. The FTA examines intercompany service fees, management charges, royalties, and financing arrangements. For free zone companies that are part of international groups, the transfer pricing review extends to whether the UAE entity earns an appropriate return for the functions it performs, the assets it uses, and the risks it assumes.

Companies that have not prepared transfer pricing documentation face two risks: an FTA adjustment that increases taxable income, and a finding that the company did not comply with the arm's length principle, which is a condition of QFZP status.

Audited financial statements

The FTA verifies that the company has filed audited financial statements prepared by a UAE-licensed auditor. The audit opinion, the notes to the financial statements, and any qualifications or emphasis of matter paragraphs are reviewed. An auditor's qualification on income classification or related-party pricing is a red flag that the FTA will follow up.

The regulatory framework: what changed in 2025

Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025

MD 229 replaced MD 265 of 2023 retroactively from 1 June 2023. Companies that filed their first corporate tax returns based on the earlier decision should verify that their income classification remains correct under the updated framework. The key changes include the expanded qualifying commodities definition (industrial chemicals, environmental commodities, associated by-products), the treasury and financing services expansion (now including activities for own account), the distribution guardrail (51% revenue threshold), and clarified rules on structured commodity financing.

MD 229 also formalised the audited financial statements requirement by cross-referencing MD 84 of 2025. The audit obligation is now embedded in the qualifying activities decision itself, removing any ambiguity about whether the audit is a condition of QFZP status or a separate compliance requirement. It is both.

Ministerial Decision No. 84 of 2025

MD 84 requires audited financial statements for two categories: companies with annual revenue exceeding AED 50 million, and all QFZPs regardless of revenue. For QFZPs, the obligation applies to tax periods commencing on or after 1 January 2025. For earlier periods, QFZPs were required to prepare audited accounts under Article 18 conditions, but the specific standards were less prescriptive. MD 84 formalises the IFRS requirement and the UAE-licensed auditor requirement.

Tax groups must file audited special-purpose financial statements regardless of revenue. This affects free zone entities that are part of a tax group with mainland companies.

FTA Corporate Tax Guide CTGFZP1

The FTA's guide provides interpretive guidance on qualifying income categories, the beneficial recipient test, the CIGA requirements, and the interaction between the QFZP regime and other corporate tax provisions (foreign PE exemption, participation exemption, loss carry-forward). The guide is not legislation, but it reflects the FTA's interpretation and is the standard against which auditors and companies should test their positions.

Companies cannot form tax groups while maintaining QFZP status. They cannot claim Small Business Relief. They cannot carry forward tax losses from non-qualifying income against qualifying income. These restrictions mean that a QFZP is, in some respects, more constrained than a mainland company, despite the 0% headline rate.

Six scenarios that trigger FTA queries

1. The IT company with one large mainland contract. A DAFZA software company earns AED 8 million from free zone clients and AED 4.5 million from a mainland government entity. Total revenue is AED 12.5 million. The de minimis threshold is 5% of AED 12.5 million (AED 625,000) or AED 5 million, whichever is lower. The mainland revenue is AED 4.5 million, and 5% of total is AED 625,000. The company has breached the threshold by AED 3.875 million. Five-year lockout.

2. The holding company with a flexi-desk. A DMCC holding company owns shares in three mainland subsidiaries. Its qualifying activity is holding shares for investment. It has no employees. Its registered address is a flexi-desk. Its board meetings are conducted by email from London. The FTA finds inadequate substance. CIGAs (investment decision-making, portfolio oversight) are not performed in the free zone.

3. The commodity trader that also provides logistics. A JAFZA company trades metals and also operates a warehouse distribution business. Metal trading revenue is AED 30 million. Logistics revenue is AED 32 million. Logistics constitutes 51.6% of total revenue. Under the MD 229 guardrail, the metal trading income can no longer be treated as qualifying. The entire revenue base is non-qualifying.

4. The return filed before the audit. A RAKEZ company files its corporate tax return on 28 September, claiming QFZP status. The audit is completed in November and reveals that AED 2 million of revenue was misclassified as qualifying. The company amends its return. The amendment triggers an FTA review, which leads to a broader examination of all five conditions.

5. The company with undocumented related-party charges. A free zone subsidiary receives management services from its UK parent, charged at cost plus 5%. There is no intercompany agreement, no benchmarking study, and no transfer pricing documentation. The FTA adjusts the pricing, increasing the subsidiary's taxable income. The FTA also raises a question about whether the arm's length condition (a QFZP requirement) was met.

6. The voluntary exit that was not intended. A free zone company's finance team checks the wrong box on the corporate tax return, electing to be taxed under the standard regime. The election is irrevocable for five years. The company did not intend to exit the QFZP regime. The FTA applies the election as filed.

How should free zone companies prepare for QFZP compliance in 2026?

The companies that retain QFZP status in 2026 and beyond will be those that treat the 0% rate as a compliance programme, not a registration status. The five conditions must be tested, documented, and verified in every tax period. The consequence of failure is not a penalty that can be paid and forgotten. It is five years of 9% tax on income the company assumed was protected.

Free zone companies should complete three steps before their next filing deadline. First, verify that income classification is correct under MD 229 of 2025, not under the repealed MD 265 of 2023. Companies that filed their first returns under the earlier framework should assess whether a voluntary disclosure is needed. Second, confirm that substance documentation is current: board minutes showing free zone decision-making, payroll records demonstrating adequate staff, lease agreements showing occupied premises, and evidence that CIGAs are performed in the free zone. Third, complete the audit before filing the return, not after. The correct sequence protects against misclassification errors that invite FTA scrutiny.

For companies whose revenue mix is close to the de minimis threshold, structural options exist. Non-qualifying activities can be moved to a mainland branch or subsidiary, which isolates non-qualifying revenue from the free zone entity's de minimis calculation. Income attributable to the mainland PE is excluded from both the numerator and denominator of the test. The restructuring must be implemented before the threshold is breached, not after.

For international groups with UAE free zone subsidiaries, the QFZP compliance review should be integrated into the group's annual corporate tax planning. The transfer pricing documentation for the UAE entity should be prepared in coordination with the group's global TP framework, and the substance position should be reviewed against the CIGAs that correspond to the entity's qualifying activities.

Legal advice on QFZP structuring, income classification, and the interaction between the QFZP regime and other provisions of the Corporate Tax Law should precede the filing, not follow the FTA query.

‍